Volkert van der G. no longer wear. an anklet The area also ban is lifted it for him gold in four cities where relatives live Pim Fortuyn. That the court in The Hague Wednesday determined in summary proceedings that Van der G. had brought against the State
. <- Google_ad_section_end () ->
<-! RSPEAK_STOP ->
<-! - google_ad_section_start () -> <-! RSPEAK_START ->
The court banned the considerable restriction of movement were and they were not proportionate to the aim pursued, namely to protect society. The ankle bears according to court nothing to reduce the chance that Van der G. strikes again. Van der G. himself had agreed to these terms, the court found irrelevant.
A number of other conditions will remain in effect. For example, Van der G. can not talk to the media and he also may not contact the families of Fortuyn and his former driver. He must also continue weekly report to the probation service. The judge called this condition is reasonable and, unnecessarily aggravating.” Van der G. came in May conditionally released after serving two thirds of his sentence. Van der Graaf shot Fortuyn on May 6, 2002 death and was sentenced to 18 years in prison. Volkert van der G. himself was not at the verdict. His lawyer, Stijn Franken, was not in court. Franks did not respond to the discretion of the judge.<-! RSPEAK_STOP -> <- google_ad_section_end () ->
<-. / comment ->
security around volkert whatsoever but he has the same lift together now cost enough money
- test
<-. / comment ->
This is a deep disgrace to democracy everything can tegenwordig even a mayor flags with swastikas allows it left that governs and makes this possible until the bomb n times explodes
- test
<-. / comment ->
Program Search Mole is over, now comes the Count Search?
- test
<-. / comment ->
Appeal is the best in my opinion.
- test
<-. / comment ->
More proof that the old domestic intelligence is behind it with the ministers of state, to Pim Fortuyn to overcome. away In criminal Volkert they express clause of penalty reduction concealed, and when he got it, he said, is still with ankle … And now that off, it is of course he will not do anything because he is not hired for dirty politics, law Haha … who still believes in here …. People we are kept on all sides for a ride and we accept this apparently
- test
<-. / comment ->
This country is not consistent with these judges. He is responsible for the limitations and now this decision. Crime pays in this country. It is hoped that the judiciary itself to deal with what happens to everyday citizens.
- test
<-. / comment ->
For the few souls – and the judge – who thinks this guy is now an “ordinary” citizen the same rights as any other has – which we should forget that he has NOT served his sentence and early release took place precisely on the basis of these conditions – I suppose from now on there is no special protection or expenses to pay for this man. Real ordinary citizens do not. Receive any preferential treatment, so he
- test
<-. / comment ->
No anklet? Then all serving sentences
- test
Now what Pim, you’re dead, and that of the G. is free, politics washes his hands in the eternal innocence and we are the people with the misery!
- test
<-. / comment ->
outrageous statement, if he does not want to be with his appointments made more agree he needs to go but she penalty previously imposed serve. Do not understand this statement. Strange justice ards people in this country.
- test
<-. / comment ->
law is so unjust.
- test
<-. / comment ->
I think one ought to conditions on his release, and he went so agree and accept that release can also be reversed because of deceptive behavior.
- test
<-. / comment ->
Times change and should be adapted to the current time. See tax reform, woningcorperaties etc. This is especially true for the judiciary is completely alienated from the changing society. Apparently judges lack any form of self-reflection and realiteitzin and they do unworldly statements. The inefficiency oozes. Abuses should be adjusted so I suggest a parliamentary inquiry into the functioning of the judiciary. On this basis, a legal system for the future.
- test
<-. / comment ->
Hi Teeven, another blunder.
- test
<-. / comment ->
With all due respect to the survivor … but a” normal” killer also gets yet no ankle bracelet? Fortuyn’s just like everyone else here, only human. = Murder Murder whether it’s Hank, Nina and Charles that was killed, the perpetrator must be the same. Punished My life is no less valuable than that of another.
- test
<-. / comment ->
unbelievable, now he can go his way with his shady deals, because he has not learned. anything
- test
<-. / comment ->
Worthless judges. That can better take care for the household.
- test
<-. / comment ->
Hope they quickly divert Volkert and that court also must experience that they raped women and killed then become, how would he react loosers here what a worthless legal system
- test
<-. / comment ->
Volkert’s smart, he let the ankle where he is, if only for his own safety and those ……..
- test
<-. / comment ->
Apart, which lives among the Dutch population is apparently irrelevant. By the way do not know how yet, but a murderer ⅔ of his sentence have to sit out. Give him 12 years!
- test
<-. / comment ->
incomprehensible, what kind of country we are still alive. That guy had one life to lock.
- test
<-. / comment ->
That 18 was a big mistake, everything after that is a logical consequence.
- test
<-. / comment ->
Well guys do not complain. Who could have expected anything else within our legislation.
In my eyes rigged, this gentleman is protected from above, that is for me now for sure!