“It is important that agreements we make with each other in politics also be met. At that point today is clearly something very wrong,” said Prime Minister Mark Rutte after the summits in the Turret where the party of the VVD and the PvdA tried exchanged each other’s positions
Rutte:. “Those involved are working on a solution and let it be clear that it is extremely important that the solution is to come.”
Labour leader Diederik Samson said after hours of deliberation “that is working hard on a solution. There is always a view to reaching a solution. ”
He did not specifically go on, because this would not bring us closer to a solution, according to him. Samson denied that the government is in danger. “No, we have a problem that we try to solve and we are working hard on it. ”
The leaders of the allied opposition parties moved earlier in the day. Around 0.00 am left the group leaders of D66, Christian Union and SGP consultation again.
Clarity
According to D66 leader Alexander Pechtold are the three opposition parties briefed about the problem arose after the bill of Minister Schippers about changes in health insurance Tuesday in the Senate was stranded. He does not know which solution is in the making. “The Senate will have to be taken seriously, ” Pechtold said.
According to SGP chairman Kees van der Staaij it is important for everyone involved to rapidly clarity. He pointed out that a rejected bill basically not again be put to the vote. Then the plan would therefore first have to change back to the House.
Van der Staaij marveled at the fact that the Labour Party senators have made a political decision and adds add that it is not the job of the Senate. He had expected the Labour parties in both the First and Second Chamber would sit on a line.
Christian Union leader Arie Slob said after the outcome to be seen. “We’ll see which they come, ” he added. Slob hopes the coalition parties come up with a solution
Show reaction Rutte:
Other proposal
Labour senator Guusje ter Horst assumes that the government comes up with a different proposal. They do not see it happen so fast that some changes come quickly, or that a new proposal on the table.
She emphasized that she voted against it because pretty fundamental objections. She finds that the position of the insurers is even stronger by the proposal. “We saw strong objections, which were worn quite broad. Not only by the three PvdA members who voted against it, ” said the senator in the night from Tuesday to Wednesday.
Ter Horst said she no Tuesday contact had with Samson and Minister Lodewijk Asscher of Social Affairs.
Ter Horst stated that she felt as a senator only bound to the election of the Labour Party. However, the PvdA of the Senate always ready to speak with the minister, she said. But any other proposal must again by the House.
Crisis Consultation
The Courtyard has been held all day feverishly crisis talks over the problem that arose when three dissident Labour senators Tuesday voted against the Health Care Act of Schippers. Her bill was voted out as a result.
The law is for the government of great importance because of the changes in health care policies and limiting the free choice of doctor. The law must also from 2016 savings of 1 billion euros annually.
After the fall of the law was first coalition agreement on Turret with Rutte, VVD party leader Halbe Zijlstra, Minister Schippers , Samson and Deputy Prime Asscher.
Customize
After the two sides sued the crisis talks in their own circle. The VVD party chairman also joined Henry Keizer joined the meeting.
For VVD Minister Schippers is the new Health a fundamentally important system change that is to combat waste in healthcare. Due to the mutual conurrentie among health insurers, who she sees with her plans arise, will improve the quality of care and also be cheaper, expects the government.
President Marleen Barth of the Labour Party Senate fraction indicated that all PvdA senators, including dissenting, are willing to talk to Schippers solution.
The question is whether Schippers, who negotiated hard with the constructive opposition and health, prepared its plans to fit. Earlier in the day she gave all that she had expected that the parties would abide by their agreements
View comments of Samson and Zijlstra:.
Free choice of doctor
With the new health care policy, the government wants to improve the quality of care and at the same time cheaper. Insured conclude a reimbursement policy or kind policy from the insurance company.
The refund policy can choose the insured to any healthcare provider (doctor or hospital) he goes for treatment. In-kind policy, the insured designated in the health insurance purchased by the care with certain doctors and hospitals and can determine the insured not decide which doctor he chooses.
Opponents of the restriction of the free choice of doctor are concerned that too much power to the big insurance companies who will decide which hospitals and doctors which patients are assigned
No comments:
Post a Comment