On what points Sonja Holleeder not truth has said she does not want to say, she relies on her privilege. Witnesses have the right to keep information to themselves which can be stressful for them.
The other sister of William, Astrid, and his ex-girlfriend, Sandra den Hartog, invoking their privilege. They all have the same attorney.
The defense of Willem Holleeder calls the statement by Sonja alarmingly because she always said to have spoken the whole truth.
Inheritances
the three women may have financially benefited from illegal income after the death of Cor van Hout and Sam Klepper. They were here previously suspected and feared yet to be prosecuted. Sonja is the former partner of Van Hout and Den Hartog is the widow of Sam clapper
The lawyers of Holleeder think the sisters have a financial interest and wants the OM they completely exempt from prosecution so that they freely can talk. If the defense does not get the chance to hear the witness they will ask for the deletion of the declarations and to release Holleeder.
Holleeder is suspected of involvement in the murder of Wood and Klepper. According to an earlier statement by Sonja in the Passage Process was money for her brother, the main motive for murder to Van Hout.
Statements
Malewicz said after the hearing that the incomplete truth Sonja casts a shadow on the reliability of the statements. “I’m not saying that its statements are false, but if they actually lied need that are supported by additional evidence,” said Malewicz.
“The importance is also great for our client because money is designated as the motive for the alleged murder of Wood. ”
Embargo
The lawyers of Holleeder, Sander Janssen and Malewicz, Friday also underlined that the sisters Holleeder and Den Hartog should be heard without having seen the statement by Holleeder. Janssen and Malewicz like to put the witness information that they do not know in order to test their reliability.
would maintain an embargo defense and confidentiality The declaration of Holleeder rest. The prosecution underscores the importance of the embargo and will not share the statement unless there otherwise decided by the court.
Holdings
The court in Amsterdam will make Tuesday a ruling on the requests of the defense. The case against Holleeder is further postponed until the next pretrial hearing on 30 November.
The decision has been taken to defend Holleeder and prosecutors more time to get things right after the delay. This delay is partly due to the summer period, but especially by the lawyers exchange Holleeder. Lawyers Janssen and Malewicz conduct the defense of Holleeder since the departure of Stijn Franken on May 11
No comments:
Post a Comment