Lawyer Geert-Jan Knoops continues to Geert Wilders to defend in the ‘less Moroccans’process. That he has let you know in a press release.
Last week wraakte Knoops one of the judges in the process, because he and Wilders found that they have the appearance of partiality had piqued. The wrakingsverzoek was rejected.
“The rejection of the wrakingsverzoek of november 4, jl., among other things, on the basis of the fact that judges are humans and mistakes are allowed to make (!), has the image of an unfair process, such as outlined during the wrakingszitting, further strengthened”, is in the press release.
“After receive due consideration will the defense continue to participate in the process, to at least a full appeal safe.”
Knoops was disappointed by the rejection. He said that continuation of the process only makes sense if the appearance of bias on the part of the court is taken away. “It’s going to be a fair process. As long as we do not realize,, we can be better with the whole process to stop,” said Knoops. It was speculated that he is the defense of Wilders would go down.
Wilders and Knoops find that right Elianne van Rens last week to multiple times biased showed in the questioning of expert witness Paul Cliteur. According to Knoops she put Cliteur several times on the wrong leg and came to the front that they are not good in legal statements about discrimination had deepened. Why would the lawyer that the judge was replaced.
[jurist] recognized that Of Rens in the interpretation of a judgment of the High Council in the error is gone. “But that can happen, that happens to also be the judges.” Added to that is that case among lawyers, as it is known that the error is “obvious,” and no one on the wrong leg can be set.
No comments:
Post a Comment