Heidy killer gets 18 years in prison on the basis of evidence undercover agents – Yahoo! News

Wim S., the murderer of Heidy Goedhart from Kaatsheuvel, must be 18 years in jail. S. hit her with a rock in 2010 on the head and then strangled her.

S., Husband of Heidy, confessed to the murder of a number of agents that were in contact with him came through a large undercover operation. The officers did everything to befriend S. They took him to Marbella and paid him 34,000 euros for odd jobs. Eventually they offered him a job, but he had to confess to the murder of Heidy. When he did, he was arrested.

The court has now decided that Wim S. confession is reliable, and that he is guilty of the murder. Therefore, it was imposed on him a prison sentence of 18 years.

Borders stretched

The case was best known for the huge undercover operation that was set up to receive S. a confession. Legal experts believe that the boundaries of what is and is not in the taking of evidence is very were stretched.

So said evidence expert Peter van Koppen last year that the entire undercover operation goes much too far. “Evidence Technically you have nothing to this all wrong interrogation tricks are applied.”.

The Public Prosecutor was disagreed: “The undercover obtaining information on a suspect and his involvement in a crime is in the law provided investigative powers that can be used when the criminal investigation that takes and the case for it is enough ponderous. “

How did the undercover operation look like?

• Undercover Agent Joe goes deliberately against the car of suspect Wim S. to. The agent pays 1,000 euros damage he has caused cash to S. This creates a friendship and business relationship between Joe, Wim S. undercover agent Katja (which occurs if Joe’s girlfriend), and the new partner of S.
• Joep provides S., who is in need of money, a job as IT specialist.
• As the friendship deepens, S. indicates increasing price of his life. Joep also puts him properly pampered with meals, nights out and rides a Harley Davidson. Joe pretends he has a successful security company. He scatters money to throw sand as S. eyes.
• S. doing opposite Joep for the first time an open book about his past. He tells him that

his wife was killed during a burglary at their home, but firmly denies that he has anything to do with her death. He also says he’s three months unjustly stuck on suspicion of murder.

S. again gets into financial trouble and get through agent Joe multiple jobs. S. is represented by Joep to his boss Philippe (also an undercover cop) who pretends S. wants to offer a permanent job. Marbella Philippe says he S. ‘ has past but that permanent positions should not stand in the way.

Joep says, to provoke the tent S., that he had killed a woman in the past, but that his boss Philippe “has solved problems’ the.

The agents always try to tempt emphatically S. a confession. S. but still denies that he killed his wife.

Philippe says he feels that S. should have been the culprit. If S. would admit, then Philippe can work something out for him, provide him with an alibi. But if he does not confess, he can forget about a permanent job.

Finally confesses S. front of Joep which he did indeed kill his wife. He tells him that he has Heidy strangled.

S. asks Joe, now who knows that he is the culprit, not more jobs. S. is strapped, and the money needed.

Joe S. enthroned along to Philippe. To him S. tells the whole story of the murder of his wife. That he had come to his act because of their poor relationship. He tells Philippe all the details.

On the basis of the confession is S. arrested two weeks after his “confession.”

More on rtlnieuws.nl:
How far can undercover action Go? “Brooks murder, then get a job

Yahoo! News