Interior
D66 wants clarification of Secretary Fred Teeven (Security and Justice) on the detention of asylum family with two small children. This confirms the spokesman D66 opposite NRC.
According to MP Gerard Schouw is securing the rejected asylum family conflict with a promise Teeven did two weeks ago in the House
Politics editor of NRC Annemarie Kas says.
“Teeven promised that families with young children who have no residence permit, no longer be placed in detention before being deported. Before this happened, but a number of parties, including Labour, there were against it. “
In some cases, a family would still be placed in detention, but the interests are in any case of the child are taken into account in the decision. And according Schouw has not happened in this case. Today he asked questions in writing to the Secretary of State.
Russian family
The message reached parliamentarian Schouw by a message from Defence for Children. According to that organization, which defends the rights of children, this is “vulnerable family” placed in a closed family provision in Zeist, with no thought was given to the interests of the children.
It is a Russian family with two sons aged five and six years old. The mother is pregnant and both she and one of the children was treated by a psychiatrist. That says Martine Goeman Defence for Children.
Discussion has been running longer
The debate whether children of asylum seekers may or may not be placed in detention, has been running longer. Fireplace:
“It seemed as there was a definitive end to these practices come, but now it seems anything but. Therefore, I want as quickly as possible elucidation of Teeven. Even the judge ruled time and again that this is not allowed. “
Teeven previously reprimanded
The Secretary of State has already been tapped by the judge on the fingers for a similar case. Goeman:
“Recently a family from Burundi became twice detained without account was taken of the interests of the children involved. Both times was the appeal of this family upheld against the detention by the court. Teeven now promised better to look at the family situation, but less than two weeks later plays this case. “
In the custody case of the Russian family gives Teeven according Goeman explicitly to act in conflict with its own policy agreements. Is in the document:
“Given above is concerned, despite the policy agreements, in custody given the closed family located in Zeist.”
No comments:
Post a Comment