That report the lawyers of both parties to the AD . Powned and hoes are involved in a lawsuit because the broadcaster had aired 2014 footage of a private appointment to cover.
Without Hoes knew Robbie Hasselt filmed him during two meetings. Cover made sexual innuendos and discussed his employer at a dinner party. Hasselt offered the images themselves in to Powned . The broadcaster sent the images out because it’s a public nuisance would be.
In the commotion joined them hoes down as mayor of Maastricht. He has filed for libel and slander.
In August some justice all that Powned should not have broadcast the images. The judge gave the parties until this week to reach a settlement, but that did not happen.
Lawful
According Powned lawyer Jens van den Brink layers positions too far apart. “We find that it was still legitimate to broadcast the images,” the lawyer told newspaper.
The court must now again faced with the case. The lawyer expects the final judgment “certainly could be affected.” It is not yet clear when the judge pronounces the verdict. “The term is usually six weeks, but it can only be in the autumn.”
No comments:
Post a Comment