Thursday, April 23, 2015

Controversial MH17 expert put on the side – AD.nl

pathologist George Maat, who came yesterday discredited because he has shown pictures of the identification of MH17 victims during a lecture that was freely accessible, put out the forensic team. Minister Ard van der Steur (Security and Justice) has reported that tonight in the House. Size was yesterday placed on non-active.

Van der Steur called the action of Professor Size yesterday ,, extremely inappropriate and distasteful. ” Size has apologized and the National Forensic Investigation Team (LTFO) where size for work, the issue regrets very much.

The Public Prosecutor, the action of Maat undesirable, because the pictures are part of the criminal research. All this has led to the collaboration with Dimension has ended, says Van der Steur.

Van der Steur said it is permissible at that pathologists with colleagues identification information sharing, but pictures can they show only with the consent of the next of kin. That had not happened here.

The reading of Maat was meant for students of health sciences in Maastricht, but also accessible to others. Oversized statements were speculative and inaccurate in some respects he went outside his field, Van der Steur said. For example, he said the plane was shot down by a missile. ,, Rightly that he has apologized. ”

Research Council
The government shall provide all information about the disaster flight MH17 where the Safety Board (AAM) asks. ,, Nothing is held back there, ” said Minister Bert Koenders of State tonight in a debate in the House about the aftermath of the plane crash.

Many parties wanted to know why his ministry the Dutch report Embassy in Kiev had not given the AAM themselves. That did not happen until early this year after publicity had been on and the Research Council had then requested the document. It was a confidential report of a meeting in Kiev where diplomats were informed about incidents last July in the skies over eastern Ukraine.

According to the minister at the AAM to determine what is relevant to the research. ,, The AAM ask, we deliver, ” he said.

Options
By law, the Department may not select itself which sends it to the AAM. The AAM must independently determine which documents are relevant and ask for it. The Ministry delivers vervolgens.Kamerleden documents indicated that the research council does not know what he does not know. That makes it difficult to ask for documents where existence is not known.

Koenders agreed that in itself, but pointed out that from his department or if there is a ‘pro-active’ possible exchange of gegevens.De AAM can also do a general request for information. So asked the AAM early January to all communication between the Foreign Ministry and the embassy in Kiev in the period between March 1, 2014 and August 31, 2014. These documents are delivered, Mr Koenders and Minister Ard van der Steur (Security and Justice ) earlier Thursday in a letter to the Chamber.
According the law should the Department not self Select what the to the AAM sends. The AAM must to all independence fix which Documents relevance his and that to questions. The Department provides that Documents vervolgens.Kamerleden essence shall that the Research Council not know what he not know. That does the difficult to ask to Documents true the exist not of known is. Koenders agreed that the is but be shall that you from his Department and there is of a so ‘proactive’ any exchange of gegevens.De AAM can also a general request to information do. So has the AAM start january required to all communication between the Department of Foreign Business and the embassy to Kiev to the period between 1 March 2014 and 31 August 2014. That Documents his delivered says Koenders and Minister Ard of the Sturgeon (Safety and Justice) before Thursday to a write to the Chamber.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment