Murder Suspect Els Borst escaped treatment – Telegraaf.nl

Murder Suspect Els Borst escaped treatment – Telegraaf.nl

LONDON –

Bart U., suspected of the murder of former minister Els Borst, was against the wishes of the prosecution in a criminal case never previously treated for delusions and fears of an Islamist terrorist attack

.

The prosecution therefore calls Monday for a “thorough and comprehensive investigation” into the events surrounding the murder suspect and the judicial approach. The man is apart from the murder of Chest also suspected of the murder of his sister, who was brought in January in a house on the Old Embankment in Rotterdam life.

“Despite the great care that there were on the person of the accused, no treatment has started, “said the OM in Rotterdam. Also, no DNA material taken from the suspect

Smith & amp.; Wesson

The Public Prosecution Service in Rotterdam, said in 2011 in a criminal case because of having illegal weapon possession insisted on treating the confused 38-year-old suspect. By an appeal and setting cassation knew from U. of escape. Yours was prosecuted in 2011 and 2012 for illegal possession of weapons. He was arrested in 2011 in Rotterdam, including a Walther pistol and a Smith & amp; Wesson revolver in his pocket.

He said at the time to be scared at the hearing for a Muslim attack on Rotterdam, which could take place any time according to the suspect. For that reason he had been armed.

Errors

The suspect resisted according to the public vehemently against psychological treatment. The prosecution in Rotterdam says the case of U. does not stand alone. More often suspects would know to avoid a necessary mental health treatment. Further research should prove true in the justice system errors have been made. “We do not polish, but raise the question of whether we have made mistakes,” said a spokesperson on behalf of the prosecution.

In Van U. is controlled according to its rapid treatment based on psychiatric reports .

The court sentenced him in September 2012 due to “a steadfast refusal to cooperate with an investigation personality” to three years. That judgment is not fixed yet. The Supreme Court judgment that after cassation referred back to the court

.

class=”clear”